Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0977

reference
942-tree-1
name
0977
tree-preservation-order

undefined

942-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027336 50.876810)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027294 50.876806,-1.027296 50.876814,-1.027302 50.876822,-1.027311 50.876828,-1.027323 50.876832,-1.027336 50.876833,-1.027349 50.876832,-1.027361 50.876828,-1.027371 50.876822,-1.027377 50.876815,-1.027379 50.876806,-1.027377 50.876798,-1.027371 50.876791,-1.027362 50.876784,-1.027337 50.876779,-1.027324 50.876780,-1.027312 50.876784,-1.027302 50.876790,-1.027296 50.876797,-1.027294 50.876806)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL